Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Main subject
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol ; 2022: 1728446, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1741722

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To investigate the recovery of lung function and chest imaging in patients with COVID-19 three months after clinical cure and discharge and the correlation between them. Methods: This study collected 80 patients diagnosed with 2019-nCoV infection who were discharged from the Taizhou Public Health Medical Center in Zhejiang Province between January 31, 2020, and March 10, 2020. Lung function examinations and lung CT scans were performed at discharge and three months after discharge. The dynamic changes examined at discharge and three months after discharge were observed, and their correlation was analyzed. All data collection ended on June 25, 2020. Results: Among the 80 COVID-19 patients discharged from the hospital, the rate of abnormality indicated by lung CT images was 97.5%, mainly presenting as patchy shadows (95%), ground-glass shadows (75%), grid-like lesions, interlobular septal thickening or fiber strip shadows (30%), consolidation shadows, and nodules (10 cases each). At discharge, 72 patients (90%) had pulmonary dysfunction, 64 (80%) had restrictive ventilatory dysfunction, and 48 (60%) had small airway dysfunction. Three months after discharge, the rate of abnormality indicated by lung CT images was 12.5%. Eight cases (10%) showed residual patchy shadows, but the density was weak, and the scope was reduced. Two cases (2.5%) showed nodular shadows. Three months after discharge, 18 patients (22.5%) had residual restrictive ventilatory dysfunction, 28 patients (35%) had small airway dysfunction, and 32 patients (40%) had diffuse dysfunction. Moreover, patients with more severe chest imaging manifestations (bilateral lesions and ground-glass shadows combined with interstitial lesions) also had more obvious lung function impairment. Conclusion: Three months after being clinically cured, patients with COVID-19 had good chest imaging absorption and no residual fibrosis. Some patients had mild to moderate pulmonary dysfunction, mainly restricted ventilation dysfunction, small airway dysfunction, and diffuse dysfunction.

2.
J Healthc Eng ; 2022: 9028835, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1639295

ABSTRACT

Background: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was discovered in December 2019 and has infected more than 80 million people worldwide, and more than 50 million people have achieved a clinical cure. In this study, the pulmonary function results of patients after clinical medicine for three months were reported. Objective: To investigate the effect of COVID-19 on lung function in patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 56 COVID-19-infected patients who were cured after the clinical treatment at Taizhou Public Health Medical Center in Zhejiang Province from January 31, 2020, to March 10, 2020. At discharge and three months after discharge, lung function was measured, including inspiratory vital capacity (IVC), forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1), forced expiratory volume in first second to inspiratory vital capacity (FEV1/IVC), maximum mid-expiratory flow rate (MEF), peak expiratory flow rate (PEF), and carbon monoxide dispersion (DLCO). Results: At discharge, there were 37 patients (66.1%) with pulmonary dysfunction, 22 patients (39.3%) with ventilation dysfunction, 31 cases (55.4%) with small airway dysfunction, and 16 cases (28.6%) with restricted ventilation dysfunction combined with small airway dysfunction. At 3 months after discharge, 24 of the 56 patients still had pulmonary dysfunction and all of them had small airway dysfunction, of which 10 patients (17.9%) were restricted ventilation dysfunction combined with small airway dysfunction. DLCO was measured three months after discharge. Twenty-nine patients (51.8%) had mild to moderate diffuse dysfunction. All pulmonary function indexes of 56 patients recovered gradually after 3 months after release, except FEV1/IVC, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were 41 patients of normal type (73.2%) and 15 patients of severe type (26.8%). Among the 15 severe patients, 8 patients (53.3%) had ventilation dysfunction at discharge, 9 patients (60%) had small airway dysfunction, 4 patients (26.7%) still had ventilation dysfunction 3 months after discharge, 7 patients (46.7%) had small airway dysfunction, and 10 patients (66.7%) had diffuse dysfunction. Among the 41 common type patients, 14 patients (34.1%) had ventilation dysfunction at discharge, 22 patients (53.7%) had small airway dysfunction, 6 patients (14.6%) still had ventilation dysfunction 3 months after discharge, 17 patients (41.5%) had small airway dysfunction, and 19 patients (46.3%) had diffuse dysfunction. Patients with severe COVID-19 had more pulmonary impairment and improved pulmonary function than normal patients. Conclusion: COVID-19 infection can cause lung function impairment, manifested as restricted ventilation dysfunction, small airway dysfunction, and diffuse dysfunction. The pulmonary function of most patients was improved 3 months after clinical cure and discharge, and some patients remained with mild to moderate diffuse dysfunction and small airway dysfunction.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Lung , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Vital Capacity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL